economic policy & Labour

Protecting Autonomy against Imperialist Coercion

THE imagery of a flat world, embedded in equal partnership and interdependence between countries within the “global village,” based on gains through free trade and market forces while eschewing power from economic relations, ends in a dramatic climax. Those who could not see imperialism in the globalised world, or could only recognise “empire without geography” as capital combined with power in a stateless form, now seem perplexed by the crude justification and assertion of coercion by the US under President Trump.

Questioning Citizenship and Using It as a Tool of Control

MIGRATION is a flow of labour that reflects both a circuit of active labour and a circulation of reserve army of labour. Different regimes of accumulation and emerging growth poles define the nature of both circuit of capital and labour. ‘Footloose capital’ prefers ‘footloose labour’ as production structures are more dispersed and in a state of flux in the current regime of neoliberal globalisation. Such labour are workers on the move. They are like packets of labour power, undefined, docile and apparently without any political voice.

ELI Scheme: Socialising Costs for Private Gains

THE cabinet has approved the Employment Linked Incentive (ELI) scheme with an outlay of Rs 99,446 crore, claiming to incentivise the creation of more than 3.5 crore jobs over a period of two years.  Out of these, 1.92 crore beneficiaries will be first timers, entering the workforce.  The benefits of the Scheme would be applicable to jobs created between August 1, 2025, and July 31, 2027.

Labour Codes: Betrayal of Labour Rights

THE Government of India proposed four Labour Codes claiming to reform the employer-worker relationship which was otherwise archaic and complex with too many rules and regulations. The much-needed labour reform as had been argued was meant to simplify the rules, address the changing needs of production flexibility and to take care of the ‘unprotected’ who are employed in the informal sector. These reforms are proposed in the context of the larger argument that competitiveness of Indian producers suffers due to labour market rigidity.

Apple’s Relocation and Tim Cook’s Dilemma!

ACCORDING to Donald Trump it is time for a reverse relocation of manufacturing from the Global South to the US. He expressed his anguish to Apple CEO Tim Cook for the plan to extend operations in India. US now needs manufacturing because by relocating low value-added assembling, they would be able to provide jobs to average Americans who badly need them. Apple employs 3 lakh workers in China and 60,000 in India. If these facilities are relocated, US could straight away create about 3.5 lakhs new jobs!

Financialisation and Sluggish Private Corporate Investment

SINCE the global financial crisis, India experienced a declining trend of investment to GDP ratio particularly due to declining investment growth in the private corporate sector. In the recent past, there has been little uptick in this ratio driven by capital expenditure undertaken by government spending. Although such high capital expenditure for successive years didn’t even ‘crowd in’ private investment. Recently the ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation has conducted a survey of private sector’s current CAPEX and future investment intentions.

US Imperialism and the Project of New Cold War

WHETHER it is neoliberalism or neoconservatism, as seen with the rise of Trump, it fundamentally serves to protect the hegemony of the rentier class while increasing the burden on working people. Since the 1970s, governments, academia, and the media have promoted ideals like free markets, trade, a level playing field, and multilateral trade norms where countries are seen as equal trading partners – at least in principle. The concept of a "flat world" and the "global village" symbolised interdependence between countries based on mutual gains.

Reshoring of Manufacturing and Job Creation in the US

THE US president is keen to selling hope to his citizens that the disruptions in trade and investments caused by tariff shocks would ultimately bring new manufacturing jobs to the US. The key argument is, tariff shocks are meant to forcing US trading partners recalibrate their exchange rate such that they would be paying to sell their products in the US market. Manufacturers would be arm twisted to open facilities in the US instead of producing elsewhere and exporting to the US market.

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - economic policy & Labour